Outline the concerns that may exist with using an RTI model when identifying students suspected as having a learning disability.
August 16, 2018
What functional deficits might affect Amanda and Jacob?
August 16, 2018

Compares or contrasts this work with another you have cited OR explains how this work illuminates your bibliography topic

Annotated Bibliography for Final Project
PSY 634 Milestone Two: Annotated Bibliography Guidelines and Rubric Prompt: The annotated bibliography should include a listing of at least eight resources that will be used in your case application paper. You should include the APA citation for each resource as well as a brief paragraph stating the conclusion of each resource and addressing how the information in the resource will support your project. The resources should include information about the chosen individual’s disorder/disability as well as information regarding treatment for the disorder/disability. Guidelines for Submission: The annotated bibliography should follow these formatting guidelines: 2–3 pages, double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, and citations in APA format. For each reference, the three- to five-sentence annotation should be indented in block format (similar to a direct quotation of greater than 40 words) and directly follow the reference. Students should pay attention to the following points in their annotation:

 Summarize the central theme and scope of the resource

 Include a paragraph that covers the following: o Evaluates the authority or background of the author o Comments on the intended audience o Compares or contrasts this work with another you have cited OR explains how this work illuminates your bibliography topic

Cite the resource using APA style (see below for example).

Sample Annotated Bibliography of a Journal Article The following example is what your final product for each resource should look like. This example (for the psychological research article A Bad Taste in the Mouth: Gustatory Disgust Influences Moral Judgment) employs APA style for the journal citation. The writer of this annotation follows the above points to create an annotation that summarizes the article’s main points and draws connections between that resource and other resources: Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22(3), 295–299. Annotation: In this article, Eskine and colleagues describe the results of an experiment that examined whether the taste in a person’s mouth influences the moral judgments that the person makes. The authors, who are researchers at the City University of New York, hypothesized that there would be a relationship between these two variables because prior research has shown that there are strong links between basic emotions and moral judgments. Indeed, the authors found that participants given a bitter drink made harsher moral judgments than those given a non-bitter drink. This article is extremely useful for my paper because it provides evidence that seemingly unimportant sensory information can influence moral judgments. Also, it nicely complements the work of Chapman et al. (2009), who found that emotional disgust and morality utilize similar brain regions. One limitation, though, is that all of the participants in the study were college students. They may have responded differently to the moral situations than older or younger participants.

http://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611398497
http://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611398497
Rubric Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value

Annotation: Conclusion

Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes clear and relevant details in support of the conclusions (23-25)

Annotation provides the main conclusions of each resource (20-22)

Annotation of each resource is incomplete and missing important information (18-19)

Annotation does not provide the main conclusions of each resource (0-17)

25

Annotation: Disorder/Disability

Information

Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides details to connect the resources to the case application paper (23-25)

Annotation provides information about the chosen disorder/disability (20-22)

Annotation does not sufficiently support the chosen disorder/disability (18-19)

Annotation does not provide information about the chosen disorder/disability (0-17)

25

Annotation: Treatment

Information

Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes treatment options supported through research (23-25)

Annotation provides information about possible treatment options (20-22)

Annotation does not propose sufficient treatment options for the disorder/disability (18-19)

Annotation does not provide information about possible treatment options (0-17)

25

Articulation of Response

Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (23-25)

Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax (20-22)

Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (18-19)

Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas (0-17)

25

Total Comments:

100%

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Chat with us on WhatsApp