RESPONSE TO J_P_

NEED A GOOD VALID RESPONSE TO PEER 150 WORDS.

The Christian concept of imago dei literally means “image of God,” but it goes much deeper than a physical image. God created us in his likeness and gave us “dominion” (influence over) over all the creatures on earth. I believe the meaning of “in his likeness” is that as he loves us, and made us as “relational, multidimensional, sexual, moral, mortal beings destined for eternal life” (Shelley & Miller, 2006). He gives us the ability to have fellowship with Him and the community of man, yet he also gave us the choice to not. Christians also believe that every person has an “intrinsic worth” no matter how weak or flawed they are. We may not agree with their beliefs but since we look to God for the “meaning” of life, “purpose and direction” we should do everything in our power to show them His way, to care for them as He would (Shelley & Miller, 2006). God even gave us His Son in human form as an example when He saw we had lost our way.

This is important and relevant in health care as even though people may have different cultures or viewpoints we should care for them as family (fellowship). As nurses we need to look the reasons for entering the profession. Is it really a job or vocation? Vocation can mean a job or it can mean something more, a divine calling to religious work (Merriam- Webster, n.d.). Shelley and Miller, (2006) if we lose sight of the meaning of human worth and what life is spiritually all about then nursing will be no more (p.79). When I interview new nurses I always ask why they became a nurse. Everyone always answers in some form or fashion “to help people”. Yet sometimes I see them getting frustrated for some reason or other and lose their compassion if only for a moment. I think we have all been there done that but we keep coming back, or most of us at least.

Existing Organization

Think of an organization that has been in existence for as long as you can remember. A Fortune 500 company for example. Why and how has the company managed to survive all the years despite radical growth in technology, political changes, and economic trials and tribulations? Where does leadership fit into the picture? Using the same organization as a basis, has the organization always operated on an ethical basis in order to remain profitable? Give specific examples to support your stance, and respond to your classmates’ posts.

APA format with supporting references

profes james Kelvin only

Global Societal Problem, Argument and Solution

Prepare: The topic of your essay needs to be a global societal problem from the following list: adult illiteracy, funding for General Education vs STEM in primary and secondary schools, minimum wage, oceans desertification, overcoming the digital divide, refugee (escaping persecution, war, or death) crises, species extinctions (modern), tax havens, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), universal statement of human rights (pick one), airport security, or wealth disparity. Review this GEN499 Sample Final Paper Guide for additional guidance on the expectations of this assignment.Reflect: Based on the topic that you have chosen, you will need to use critical thinking skills to thoroughly understand how this topic can be a global societal problem and determine some logical solution(s) to the problem.Write: This Final Argumentative Essay will present research relating the critical thinker to the modern, globalized world. In this assignment, you need to address the following items in separate sections with new headings for each:

  • Identify the global societal problem within the introductory paragraph and conclude with a thesis statement that states your proposed solution(s) to the problem. For guidance on how to construct a good introduction paragraph, please review the Introduction Paragraph Guideline from the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Describe background information on how that problem developed or came into existence. Show why this is a societal problem, and provide perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations so that you fully represent what different parts of society have to say about this issue.
  • Construct an argument supporting your proposed solution(s). Be sure to consider multiple disciplines or populations so that your solution shows that multiple parts of society will benefit from this solution. Provide evidence from multiple scholarly sources as evidence that your proposed solution is viable.
  • Interpret statistical data from at least three, peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Do this by discussing the validity, reliability, and any biases; identifying the strengths and weaknesses of these sources; and pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research. You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources. Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from your solution. Be sure to provide at least one positive ethical outcome as well as at least one negative ethical outcome that could result from your solution, and explain at least two ethical issues related to each of those outcomes. It’s important to consider all of society.
  • Develop a conclusion as the last paragraph(s) of the essay, starting with rephrasing your thesis statement and then presenting the major points of the topic and how they support your argument. For guidance on how to write a good conclusion paragraph, please review the Conclusion Paragraph Guideline from the Ashford Writing Center.

The Final Argumentative Essay

  • Must be 3,300 – 3,900 words in length (approximately between 10 – 12 pages; excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
    • Running header with page numbers
  • Must include in-text citations from at least 10 scholarly sources. Be sure to integrate your research rather than simply inserting it.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined here and here.
  • Must have no more than 15% quoted material in the body of your essay based on the Turnitin report. Reference list will be excluded from the Turnitin originality score.
  • Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Source Document Requirements:
    • Multimedia sources (such as videos) may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. If multimedia sources are used, they must be authored and distributed by credible sources, such as universities, law schools, medical schools, or professors, or found in the Ashford University Library.
    • Government sources may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. Examples include whitehouse.gov, state.gov, usa.gov, cdc.gov, etc. These websites can be used to make a stronger point about your proposed soluation within the argument.
    • Where print documents are used for source materials, those must be peer-reviewed, scholarly journal articles, and academically published books. Popular media sources (e.g., newspapers, magazines, television and radio shows, etc.) must not be used. Materials from advocacy groups (e.g., Greenpeace, Human Rights Campaign, National Organization for Women, etc.) must not be used.
    • Sites such as ProCon.org and Wikipedia must not be used.
    • Religious texts must not be used.

Good Critical Thinking Tips:

  • Your paper should include academic sources that explain multiple sides of the issue.
  • Your interpretations of the evidence should be objective and state the conclusions and theses presented in the evidence clearly and fairly.
  • Your paper should place the various forms of evidence in relation to one another and demonstrate why one form or perspective is stronger than the other positions that one could take on the issue.
  • Your paper should point out the limitations of current evidence and attempt to indicate areas for future research.
  • Writing Tools:
    • Before you submit your written assignment, you are encouraged to review the The Grammarly Guide: How to Set Up & Use Grammarly tutorial, set up a Grammarly account (if you have not already done so), and use Grammarly to review a rough draft of your assignment. Then carefully review all issues identified by Grammarly and revise your work as needed.

Evaluating a Persuasive Speech

Submission Type: Word document (brief essay/speech review)

For this activity, watch the following the Persuasive Speech posted below. You can start the speech at the 28 second mark.

https://notorious-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/originals/o-3Hwi5QGVRAH86AM61k2mJYxPyEXzRkig/transcodings/t-3QTuCJSteYjdvk8uwKQePaeTH3LU8Acn.mp4?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAIBPUENZMC6BEKTMA%2F20170718%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20170718T205829Z&X-Amz-Expires=86400&X-Amz-Security-Token=FQoDYXdzEGYaDEFLVEsKRHZDeUIZLiK3A4KylyM5hVadBngxR1DLTLUXB7bSUE2dW5BX5xkTsMk5F7w2x0vWY2wzjij3bY3KdHyXcgZdatPN2G17OwxnQ64leXC5B4Z4%2BkZZ2ZvsMFhjiMx8z7ImbOdcBxlLi21ac9rYNAByoTPFhQxTn81K%2B8mJzEZfQVFwrj5dyO%2B9kVQ%2BCEjmxnOBlDak4DJNyD%2FoEXIUGurcQ2UYLDR6OZRXEOBk%2BcL1QXjwcdr5PLW3b3JbVuD2p1QkLsg3U70RFaPkztnbYwdG5L2pp4DO6Gw0CtXZ%2Fvf0jY5kYDwx15jii3JvyQTJvnxzxM06AvEYGbgujfVaw0uSKh9%2Fg7CZ%2F95EuUo%2FQFp73odO1gZSqEExA6Qheh2yoOhjoPD%2BIuHN1vEmQQYlwusT7CxlhaDVK37E7FEW31bGbGkjzpwM%2FS0xO%2F1LjiiguSqpAU2qQgc%2BZD4ILL4raiMwh9dJqOhMkoRsFP4vXyEeAMDKoqdHOL6PtHpn6Xlaxw25tYzlL1tg5dPqb3VIbXnEZcF2co6QCk7Uny8xgLRJDD%2B%2FkrMPWFPN5%2BWv6JNaii0CryxZpmLto2Nrh9f4F9bF6TIohN65ywU%3D&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=cd11846812d5e1b018e62f196538ecb8be27c7cc05ec95d9fe42fcdadb1c70b2

After viewing the speech, please respond to the following in a 1-2 page essay (Word Document):

1.) Comment on the speech’s introduction (1-2 paragraphs):

  • Did the speaker effectively establish credibility (ethos) in the introduction?  Explain.
  • Did the speaker effectively relate the topic to the audience in the introduction?  Explain.
  • Did the speaker provide a clear thesis statement and a clear preview the main points in the introduction? What are the speaker’s three main points?

2.) Comment on the content of the speech (1-2 paragraphs):

  • Did speaker clearly cite 5 credible sources?
  • Overall, was the speech persuasive to you? Why or why not?

3.) Comment on the speaker’s delivery, such as eye contact, movement, speaking voice, volume, posture, etc. (1-2 paragraphs)

  • What delivery elements did the speaker do well?  What delivery elements can the speaker work on?

4.) Finally, discuss at least 2 strengths and at least 2 areas of improvement (weaknesses) of the speech. (1-2 paragraphs)

NOTE: Because you will be commenting on the speaker’s delivery in #3, focus your strengths and weaknesses on other areas (such as the content of the message, the speaker’s sources, the organization of the speech, the speaker’s attention-getter and conclusion, etc.)

Topic 3 DQ 1

Max Points: 5.0

If a counselor is licensed, does this make him/her competent as a counselor? Provide insight from the readings this week as to how a counselor can maintain his/her professional competency.

The DQ response must be 150-200 words and have at least one citation and one reference in APA format.

Week 6

As a counselor, being competent and familiar with risk assessment is essential to the therapeutic process; both in giving client’s context related to treatment of their psychological symptoms and in helping the clinician prioritize short- and long-term treatment outcomes.

Part 1 : Write a 300-700-word scenario that involves a client that you believe requires a risk assessment. 

Part 2 : Write a 150-250-word summary, discussing specific behaviors that lead you to create a risk assessment.

Part 3 : Write a 500-750-word summary, discussing how you would assess the client. Include the following in your discussion:

  1. Questions you would ask to determine the client’s level of risk
  2. Protocol you would follow based on the client’s answers, including documentation
  3. Include at least three scholarly references in your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This assignment meets the following CACREP Standard:

sociology essay

Please define and discuss Gender Socialization. How does this differential treatment prepare us for the Gendered Division of Paid Work?

Requirment:

1. wirte an essay based on the textbook chapter 6.

2. wirte at least 3 FULL pages, do not exceed 5pages.

3. DO NOT use subtitle.

4. Use concrete examples.

the number associated with your chosen situation and a brief description. Then answer the following questions: What went wrong with the worker-client boundaries? How might you respond differently (if at all) if the client was from a culture, background, e

Discussion 2: “Blurred Boundaries”

In general, client and human and social services professionals’ relationships are to be avoided. However, where is that boundary drawn? Does this avoidance always hold true, or is it situational? Do boundaries change after you are finished working with the client? As a professional, it is essential you are aware of expectations of your actions. If boundaries are crossed, you could face ramifications at your organization and even legal ramifications.

To Prepare

Review the Summers text, pp. 136–138. Choose two hypothetical practice situations under “Blurred Boundaries?” You will respond with your two chosen situations and identify what went wrong with the worker-client boundaries AND what needs to happen to correct the situation. Now, imagine that the client was from a culture, background, ethnicity or country very different from your own. Think about how you might respond differently.

By Day 4

Post the number associated with your chosen situation and a brief description. Then answer the following questions: What went wrong with the worker-client boundaries? How might you respond differently (if at all) if the client was from a culture, background, ethnicity or country very different from your own?

GEN499 Week 3 Discussion 1

Ashford 4: – Week 3 – Discussion 1

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses.